Please do not go thinking that this is the last best-selling literature or a new upcoming film. Nor is the name of a new television show of those who occupy prime time. I will refer simply to figure 
colloquial animal called toad, with whom he contemptuously designated many employees, wanting to stereotype as informers. But going forward such as the title, we point out two totally opposite sides. And that's what I offer in this post.
colloquial animal called toad, with whom he contemptuously designated many employees, wanting to stereotype as informers. But going forward such as the title, we point out two totally opposite sides. And that's what I offer in this post. Ha, ha, ha, how long?, Say the toads when they discredit poor and without anyone to defend them, as is the case of one who is a victim of gossip secrets of a toad, which rise to discredit the victim, and being secretly, there is the possibility that someone defended. Even though I said in a jokingly way alegrórica, is the terrible reality of who was the target of a toad.
points out: In a company called toad gossip individual who takes the manager. Undoubtedly, this is a negative subject 
mind be negligible for this type of employee, inefficient labor, but dangerously efficient to betray colleagues. Sadly this is a very common character in any business, large or small. When working with someone who is known to be a "frog", you have to watch much of what is said and done, it is someone who conspires dangerously behind you and is always behind you and what you do, for do their job, ie SAPEAR.
But it happens that the coin has another side: the unjustly called "toad" and I mean the person is not suitable for dishonesty, and even when not repeated in the management, the only disagreeing and depart from evil deeds, condemned the epithet of the toad, but not because it is, but because those who act fraudulently in a company seeking to discredit the entire employee with that nickname, motivated by the fear that Full employee give them away. I met a kitchen employee who caused much discredit to another full partner, accusing him of frog, when he advised him not to take things in the kitchen. That is the other side, accusing it unworthy of a toad, but on the contrary, ie to be intact.
the manager of a company will hold two thoughts: to discern who is and is not a toad since it is also known that many managers would love to "sow toads" in strategic areas to obtain information through them: they are the managers who need the use of "frog strategy" for professional lack of performance. On the other hand, when you hear someone tell frog, to be alert because it is a department where things are happening "strange" and to discredit that wants no part in such acts.
will conclude with what I call "the strategy of innocent toad." Maybe did not make the best use of my capacity to define reality, but I want to define that concept to a manager who knew that when interrogating an employee told him falsely that a colleague had said something (invented by the manager), to create moods of obfuscation and vengeful plan that began to say things he knew (sapear, colloquially speaking). Actually the lowest, but as true as the sun's warm light, and certainly I am sure it is not an isolated case in many other companies because many managers make use of such baseness.
mind be negligible for this type of employee, inefficient labor, but dangerously efficient to betray colleagues. Sadly this is a very common character in any business, large or small. When working with someone who is known to be a "frog", you have to watch much of what is said and done, it is someone who conspires dangerously behind you and is always behind you and what you do, for do their job, ie SAPEAR. But it happens that the coin has another side: the unjustly called "toad" and I mean the person is not suitable for dishonesty, and even when not repeated in the management, the only disagreeing and depart from evil deeds, condemned the epithet of the toad, but not because it is, but because those who act fraudulently in a company seeking to discredit the entire employee with that nickname, motivated by the fear that Full employee give them away. I met a kitchen employee who caused much discredit to another full partner, accusing him of frog, when he advised him not to take things in the kitchen. That is the other side, accusing it unworthy of a toad, but on the contrary, ie to be intact.
the manager of a company will hold two thoughts: to discern who is and is not a toad since it is also known that many managers would love to "sow toads" in strategic areas to obtain information through them: they are the managers who need the use of "frog strategy" for professional lack of performance. On the other hand, when you hear someone tell frog, to be alert because it is a department where things are happening "strange" and to discredit that wants no part in such acts.
will conclude with what I call "the strategy of innocent toad." Maybe did not make the best use of my capacity to define reality, but I want to define that concept to a manager who knew that when interrogating an employee told him falsely that a colleague had said something (invented by the manager), to create moods of obfuscation and vengeful plan that began to say things he knew (sapear, colloquially speaking). Actually the lowest, but as true as the sun's warm light, and certainly I am sure it is not an isolated case in many other companies because many managers make use of such baseness.
0 comments:
Post a Comment