few years ago I had the opportunity to read an article that presented a summary of failures that had paralyzed the normal development of certain operations Public Organization. Many uncertainties, and inaccuracies caused inaccuracies in the measures used, with the loss of valuable resources of time and finances. These questions had to be identified administrative and operational as soon as possible. Therefore, The idea was to locate the causes of the malfunction, to take immediate corrective action, which never took, because of public bureaucracy and paperwork of permanent changes of supervisory personnel from Regional Government High confidence that the disease will always be public enterprises, where political patronage makes such companies synonymous with "inefficient firms, and in some cases" inoperative companies "to reach total bankruptcy.
remember one of the reasons mentioned in this report, and that the sun today I have seen so often in all types of businesses, you could say it is cancer of the organizations. If I remember correctly, That report called this problem: "The lack of internality, and experience working on my sites I will provide arguments to explain in more didactic than I can, through the development of subsequent paragraphs.
The lack of internality relates to the conduct of persons not to see them any responsibility for things they have done, but thinks it is the responsibility of others. What is critical is that others feel the same. The consequence is that things end up not getting, or getting worse, because nobody wants to take responsibility.
And as illustrated in the accompanying figure, in such an environment, there is no room for other less harmful attitudes. This is the case of mutual accusations which is not done. Every one says to another as responsible, and thus becomes a vicious circle of inaction, where all cash is the ability to point to another. Then I give a video that perfectly caricatured the statement, check it out:
really, really, really, it's real impressive ineffectiveness drama seen in the video, as a result of the lack of internality of each employee.
I think there is sufficient as illustrated, but I want to add a metaphor, I believe that employees suffer from "lack of internality "should learn from the ants. How so?.
As it happens that from my childhood, I felt admiration for the" instinct "of cooperation that prevails between the ants. Without having remarkable powers of human reason in Instead, they have the instinct to unite all to provision their nest. Exercising argumentative relax, I can not see any ant saying: What do the others, because it's not up to me at all, because if that happens, just not could survive, and in companies where no sense of cooperation prevelece of ants, simply can not survive!.
But if we took our video supplied to the syndrome of "lack of internality" is so serious that even when you have a disproportionate fire in your company, if you think it's not your responsibility, let it burn your business. The video speaks for itself when it shows "heads" (?) As affected by this syndrome, who are fighting and accusing each other, and the fire on the rise. That is, are convinced that if they do not belong to them, "Do not make anything." Shame!, I would have a magic wand and make employees ants with that way of thinking, to learn something from these insects, learning would be when they stop being insects, will earn the right to employees must be respected as worthy. Of course, since there are no magic wands, but if the training and professional improvement, we must attack this problem with proper training.
The final part of the video presents an equally important message: when YOU ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY!, You can put out the fire (fire metaphorically understood as any business problem.) Taking responsibility means deepening in my way of thinking and acting that for me to do as part of an organization, and I want to note that the organization called "family home" is also a lack of internality occurs in children who do not want "nor wash dish where they eat "because they have" internalized "the job as a staff function, a situation very recurrent in many homes.
The puppy video also makes a moral: some people want to provide solutions to the problem, but lack of decision making to attack the problem, "let the company on fire."
The lack of internality, is primarily a cultural problem-familiar, because they feel responsibility or even simple household chores, we want to pass it to others. Then, it is a problem "administrative egocentrism, which suggests that the supervisor is reducing or is losing prestige or authority, if it does things that do not belong.
is necessary to promote change, to start in the same house, which should be reading this post. While that change will not operate, we are not only unworthy insects, because even tiny insects such as ants, understand the message of nature that brings them together for the benefit of the entire group. Learning to work as a team of fellow compactly united, motivated and enthusiastic about what we do, is what will build "a successful business" in our workplace. But I repeat yet again: We need to internalize our thinking and acting, the actions of team unity and purpose.
remember one of the reasons mentioned in this report, and that the sun today I have seen so often in all types of businesses, you could say it is cancer of the organizations. If I remember correctly, That report called this problem: "The lack of internality, and experience working on my sites I will provide arguments to explain in more didactic than I can, through the development of subsequent paragraphs.
The lack of internality relates to the conduct of persons not to see them any responsibility for things they have done, but thinks it is the responsibility of others. What is critical is that others feel the same. The consequence is that things end up not getting, or getting worse, because nobody wants to take responsibility.
And as illustrated in the accompanying figure, in such an environment, there is no room for other less harmful attitudes. This is the case of mutual accusations which is not done. Every one says to another as responsible, and thus becomes a vicious circle of inaction, where all cash is the ability to point to another. Then I give a video that perfectly caricatured the statement, check it out:
really, really, really, it's real impressive ineffectiveness drama seen in the video, as a result of the lack of internality of each employee.
I think there is sufficient as illustrated, but I want to add a metaphor, I believe that employees suffer from "lack of internality "should learn from the ants. How so?.
As it happens that from my childhood, I felt admiration for the" instinct "of cooperation that prevails between the ants. Without having remarkable powers of human reason in Instead, they have the instinct to unite all to provision their nest. Exercising argumentative relax, I can not see any ant saying: What do the others, because it's not up to me at all, because if that happens, just not could survive, and in companies where no sense of cooperation prevelece of ants, simply can not survive!.
But if we took our video supplied to the syndrome of "lack of internality" is so serious that even when you have a disproportionate fire in your company, if you think it's not your responsibility, let it burn your business. The video speaks for itself when it shows "heads" (?) As affected by this syndrome, who are fighting and accusing each other, and the fire on the rise. That is, are convinced that if they do not belong to them, "Do not make anything." Shame!, I would have a magic wand and make employees ants with that way of thinking, to learn something from these insects, learning would be when they stop being insects, will earn the right to employees must be respected as worthy. Of course, since there are no magic wands, but if the training and professional improvement, we must attack this problem with proper training. The final part of the video presents an equally important message: when YOU ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY!, You can put out the fire (fire metaphorically understood as any business problem.) Taking responsibility means deepening in my way of thinking and acting that for me to do as part of an organization, and I want to note that the organization called "family home" is also a lack of internality occurs in children who do not want "nor wash dish where they eat "because they have" internalized "the job as a staff function, a situation very recurrent in many homes.
The puppy video also makes a moral: some people want to provide solutions to the problem, but lack of decision making to attack the problem, "let the company on fire."
The lack of internality, is primarily a cultural problem-familiar, because they feel responsibility or even simple household chores, we want to pass it to others. Then, it is a problem "administrative egocentrism, which suggests that the supervisor is reducing or is losing prestige or authority, if it does things that do not belong.
is necessary to promote change, to start in the same house, which should be reading this post. While that change will not operate, we are not only unworthy insects, because even tiny insects such as ants, understand the message of nature that brings them together for the benefit of the entire group. Learning to work as a team of fellow compactly united, motivated and enthusiastic about what we do, is what will build "a successful business" in our workplace. But I repeat yet again: We need to internalize our thinking and acting, the actions of team unity and purpose. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment